Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched September 2006
- Renewed by Samsung GX-20

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GX-10 (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.

The XZ-2 iHS was brought out 6 years later than the GX-10 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the GX-10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung GX-10
XZ-2 iHS | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 76 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper screen (+710k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
GX-10 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung GX-10
XZ-2 iHS | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-10 has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the GX-10.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and GX-10 is 85 and 59 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and GX-10.
To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will show more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung GX-10 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2006-09-21 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 793 grams (1.75 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $450 | $850 |