Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 4.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-481mm (F) lens
  • 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
  • Revealed August 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview

Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 4 months later than the Galaxy Camera 4G which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the Galaxy Camera 4G in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G

 XZ-2 iHS Galaxy Camera 4G 
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution920k0kSharper screen (+920k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 Galaxy Camera 4G XZ-2 iHS 
Screen size4.8"3"Bigger screen (+1.8")

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G

 XZ-2 iHS Galaxy Camera 4G 
RevealedDecember 2012August 2012Same age
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has proportions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the Galaxy Camera 4G.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and Galaxy Camera 4G is 85 and 90 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The graphic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and Galaxy Camera 4G.

Plainly, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G will show greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography advice
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Portrait photography advice
46
has manual focus
has face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
30
megapixel count decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G as a Street photography camera
66
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
more heavy than average (346 grams)
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (305 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography factors
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sports photography factors
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
good battery life (340 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
44
amazing zoom range (23-481mm 20.9 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G as a Travel photography camera
61
good battery life (340 shots)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than average (346 grams)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
72
lighter than average (305g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
pretty wide (23mm)
long reach (481mm)
very good max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography factors
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Landscape photography factors
55
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (340 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
no Timelapse recording
47
pretty wide (23mm)
very good max aperture (f)
lovely big screen (4.8 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Vlogging with Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
36
really wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with microphone port
does not contain selfie friendly screen
more heavy than average (346 grams)
36
pretty wide (23mm)
very good max aperture (f)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (305 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone port
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSamsung Galaxy Camera 4G
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2012-12-18 2012-08-29
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - 1.4GHz Quad-Core
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 -
Max native ISO 12800 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 23-481mm (20.9x)
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 4.8 inch
Screen resolution 920k dot 0k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s -
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346 grams (0.76 pounds) 305 grams (0.67 pounds)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $450 $550