Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is WB600
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ30W, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the HZ30W (12MP) is relatively well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HZ30W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 2 years after the HZ30W which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the HZ30W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ30W. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung HZ30W
| XZ-2 iHS | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 36 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| HZ30W | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ30W
| XZ-2 iHS | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ30W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the HZ30W.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and HZ30W is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and HZ30W.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got the exact same MP albeit different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS uses the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult. The more recent XZ-2 iHS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung HZ30W |
| Other name | - | WB600 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $450 | $280 |