Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX mini
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


93 Imaging
51 Features
68 Overall
57
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX mini Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20.5MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX-M Mount
- 196g - 110 x 62 x 23mm
- Launched March 2014

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX mini Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX mini, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and NX mini (20.5MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and NX mini (1") feature different sensor dimensions.

The XZ-2 iHS was introduced 15 months earlier than the NX mini which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX mini being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the NX mini with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX mini Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX mini. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX mini Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung NX mini
XZ-2 iHS | NX mini | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX mini over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
NX mini | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2014 | ![]() | December 2012 | Newer by 15 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX mini
XZ-2 iHS | NX mini | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX mini Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung NX mini has proportions of 110mm x 62mm x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 196 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX mini in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the NX mini.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and NX mini is 85 and 93 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX mini Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The image here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and NX mini.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS using its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Samsung NX mini will result in more detail using its extra 8.5MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX mini Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX mini Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung NX mini | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung NX mini |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2014-03-19 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20.5 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX-M |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 2 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT-LCD (180 degree tilt) |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Smart Flash, auto, auto + redeye reduction, fill-in, fill-in + redeye reduction, 1st curtain, 2nd curtain |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/200 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 (all 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 196 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 110 x 62 x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 650 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $450 | $530 |