Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX2000
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX1100
- Renewed by Samsung NX3000
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX2000, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and NX2000 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 11 months before the NX2000 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the NX2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX2000. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung NX2000
XZ-2 iHS | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
NX2000 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | December 2012 | Fresher by 11 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.7" | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") | |
Display resolution | 1152k | 920k | Clearer display (+232k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX2000
XZ-2 iHS | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX2000 has measurements of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the NX2000.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and NX2000 is 85 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The visual below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and NX2000.
All in all, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX2000 will give greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung NX2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2013-11-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 228 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 340 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $450 | $599 |