Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Samsung NX300 front
Portability
86
Imaging
63
Features
73
Overall
67

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Samsung NX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
  • Released November 2013
  • Replaced the Samsung NX210
  • New Model is Samsung NX500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Overview

The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung NX300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and NX300 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The XZ-2 iHS was released 11 months before the NX300 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the NX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung NX300

 XZ-2 iHS NX300 
Screen resolution920k768kSharper screen (+152k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 NX300 XZ-2 iHS 
ReleasedNovember 2013December 2012Newer by 11 months
Screen size3.3"3"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX300

 XZ-2 iHS NX300 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).

See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung NX300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the NX300.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and NX300 is 85 and 86 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The picture below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and NX300.

All in all, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX300 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography features
Samsung NX300 Portrait photography features
46
you can focus manually
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
77
manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection focus
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography info
Samsung NX300 Street photography info
66
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
very small sensor (1/1.7")
more heavy than average in class (346g)
80
screen tilts
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
supports focus via touch
great high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Sports photography with Samsung NX300
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
great battery pack (340 shots)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
73
high shutter speed (1/6,000s)
megapixel count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography highlights
Samsung NX300 Travel photography highlights
61
great battery pack (340 shots)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (346 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
67
supports focus via touch
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography information
Samsung NX300 Landscape photography information
55
you can focus manually
fairly wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
great battery pack (340 shots)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of Timelapse mode
72
manual focus
switch lenses (Samsung NX mount)
nice screen size (3.3")
megapixel count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
no image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging factors
Samsung NX300 Vlogging factors
36
fairly wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external microphone socket
does not posses selfie friendly display
more heavy than average in class (346g)
33
touchscreen capability
provides face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
does not have external mic support
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX300
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSamsung NX300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Samsung NX300
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2012-12-18 2013-11-24
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - DRIMe IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 12800 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 35 247
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Number of lenses - 32
Focal length multiplier 4.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display diagonal 3" 3.3"
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 768 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/6000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 9.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346 grams (0.76 pounds) 331 grams (0.73 pounds)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 49 76
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 12.7
DXO Low light rating 216 942
Other
Battery life 340 photos 330 photos
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-90B BP1130
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Retail cost $450 $750