Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released November 2013
- Replaced the Samsung NX210
- New Model is Samsung NX500
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung NX300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and NX300 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was released 11 months before the NX300 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the NX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX300. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung NX300
XZ-2 iHS | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 768k | Sharper screen (+152k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
NX300 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2013 | December 2012 | Newer by 11 months | |
Screen size | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX300
XZ-2 iHS | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung NX300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the NX300.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and NX300 is 85 and 86 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The picture below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and NX300.
All in all, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX300 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung NX300 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2013-11-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 331 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 330 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $450 | $750 |