Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung PL120
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
99 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung PL120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung PL120 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung PL120, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the PL120 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and PL120 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 24 months after the PL120 which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung PL120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the PL120 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung PL120 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Samsung PL120. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung PL120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung PL120
| XZ-2 iHS | PL120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | January 2011 | More modern by 24 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL120 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| PL120 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung PL120
| XZ-2 iHS | PL120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung PL120 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung PL120 has dimensions of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung PL120 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the PL120.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and PL120 is 85 and 99 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung PL120 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and PL120.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung PL120 will resolve extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung PL120 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung PL120 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung PL120 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung PL120 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | - |
| Launch cost | $450 | $150 |