Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL102
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally Known as ES55
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and SL102 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 4 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung SL102
XZ-2 iHS | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SL102 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung SL102
XZ-2 iHS | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the SL102.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and SL102 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The graphic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and SL102.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will resolve more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung SL102 |
Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $450 | $130 |