Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL202
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL202 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and SL202 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 3 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung SL202
XZ-2 iHS | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | February 2009 | Fresher by 47 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SL202 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung SL202
XZ-2 iHS | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the SL202.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and SL202 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The graphic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and SL202.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will produce more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung SL202 |
Also called as | - | PL50 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $450 | $140 |