Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternate Name is ST50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TL100 (12MP) is pretty similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TL100 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 4 years after the TL100 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the TL100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Samsung TL100. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung TL100
| XZ-2 iHS | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TL100 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL100
| XZ-2 iHS | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL100 has proportions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the TL100.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and TL100 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The image here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and TL100.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS comes with the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF easier. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL100 |
| Also called as | - | ST50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 219g (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $22 |