Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternate Name is ST50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TL100 (12MP) is pretty similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TL100 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 4 years after the TL100 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the TL100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Samsung TL100. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung TL100
| XZ-2 iHS | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TL100 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL100
| XZ-2 iHS | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL100 has proportions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the TL100.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and TL100 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The image here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and TL100.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS comes with the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF easier. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL100 |
| Also called as | - | ST50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 219g (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $22 |