Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220
Portability
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
95 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Samsung TL220
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
- Also referred to as ST500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL220, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TL220 (12MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TL220 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 3 years after the TL220 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the TL220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL220. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung TL220
| XZ-2 iHS | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 41 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TL220 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL220
| XZ-2 iHS | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL220 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL220 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the TL220.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and TL220 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and TL220.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same resolution but different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS has the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography highlights
Samsung TL220 Portrait photography highlights
you can focus manually
has face detect focus
supports RAW files
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Samsung TL220 as a Street photography camera
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
more heavy than competition in class (346 grams)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features focus via touch
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Sports photography with Samsung TL220
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
better than average battery pack (340 shots)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL220 as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (346g)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
features focus via touch
has built in flash
pretty wide (27mm)
lack of Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography features
Samsung TL220 Landscape photography features
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
missing Timelapse function
pretty wide (27mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging features
Samsung TL220 Vlogging features
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have microphone port
does not have selfie friendly screen
more heavy than competition in class (346g)
pretty wide (27mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL220 |
| Alternate name | - | ST500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 169 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $450 | $90 |