Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
- Also referred to as ST500
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL220, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TL220 (12MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TL220 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 3 years after the TL220 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the TL220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL220. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung TL220
XZ-2 iHS | TL220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | August 2009 | Newer by 41 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TL220 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL220
XZ-2 iHS | TL220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL220 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL220 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the TL220.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and TL220 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and TL220.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same resolution but different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS has the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL220 |
Alternate name | - | ST500 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2009-08-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 169 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $450 | $90 |