Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL500
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Released July 2010
- Additionally referred to as EX1
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL500 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL500, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/1.7").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 2 years after the TL500 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the TL500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Samsung TL500. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung TL500
| XZ-2 iHS | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 30 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 614k | Crisper screen (+306k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TL500 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL500
| XZ-2 iHS | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has sizing of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the TL500.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and TL500 is 85 and 88 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specifications. The pic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and TL500.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus XZ-2 iHS to give you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL500 |
| Alternate name | - | EX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2010-07-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 386 grams (0.85 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $450 | $527 |