Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/999d5/999d5267cbeeded12e1c296ab2c2e623b4be3f06" alt="Samsung WB150F front Samsung WB150F front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB150F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is pretty similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WB150F (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 12 months after the WB150F and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the WB150F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB150F. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung WB150F
XZ-2 iHS | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 12 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WB150F | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB150F
XZ-2 iHS | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the WB150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d74d/1d74d14f9f8ea7d911f0a18255f08ca343744bbb" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and WB150F is 85 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba478/ba47806160e4aa5dd053634a968515694ca7feb6" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and WB150F.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Samsung WB150F will offer extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d3f0/3d3f0d8de28bec55b1d4bf5d50f566ad00f22777" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/221c4/221c4741a81ecd89c569769b1a0032a78e6725c7" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung WB150F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 188 grams (0.41 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $450 | $230 |