Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung WB250F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WB250F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.

The XZ-2 iHS was introduced around the same time to the WB250F so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the WB250F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung WB250F
XZ-2 iHS | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WB250F | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung WB250F
XZ-2 iHS | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2013 | Same generation |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung WB250F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the WB250F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and WB250F is 85 and 93 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and WB250F.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung WB250F will produce more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung WB250F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 226 grams (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $450 | $250 |