Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP1
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
87 Imaging
42 Features
30 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- No Video
- 28mm (F) lens
- 270g - 113 x 60 x 50mm
- Released May 2008
- Renewed by Sigma DP1s
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP1 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sigma DP1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and DP1 (5MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and DP1 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was released 4 years after the DP1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the DP1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sigma DP1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sigma DP1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sigma DP1
| XZ-2 iHS | DP1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 | May 2008 | Newer by 56 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| DP1 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sigma DP1
| XZ-2 iHS | DP1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP1 has measurements of 113mm x 60mm x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 270 grams (0.60 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sigma DP1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the DP1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and DP1 is 85 and 87 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and DP1.
As you can see, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP1 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sigma DP1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sigma DP1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2008-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 270 grams (0.60 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 113 x 60 x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $450 | $566 |