Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD14

Portability
85
Imaging
36
Features
67
Overall
48
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sigma SD14 front
Portability
59
Imaging
41
Features
30
Overall
36

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Sigma SD14
(Full Review)
  • 5MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
  • Revealed September 2006
  • Old Model is Sigma SD10
  • Updated by Sigma SD15
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD14 Overview

Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sigma SD14, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sigma. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and SD14 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 6 years after the SD14 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the SD14 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sigma SD14

 XZ-2 iHS SD14 
RevealedDecember 2012September 2006More modern by 76 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k150kSharper display (+770k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 SD14 XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sigma SD14

 XZ-2 iHS SD14 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sigma SD14 has dimensions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") along with a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).

Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sigma SD14 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the SD14.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD14 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and SD14 is 85 and 59 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD14 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The picture below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and SD14.

As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will show more detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD14 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD14 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography info
Sigma SD14 Portrait photography info
45
focusing manually
has face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
48
you can focus manually
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
low resolution (5MP)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Sigma SD14 as a Street photography camera
65
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
more heavy than others (346g)
48
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (800)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Sports photography with Sigma SD14
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
good battery (340 CIPA)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
no phase detect autofocus
28
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
does not have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low resolution (5MP)
no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography details
Sigma SD14 Travel photography details
61
good battery (340 CIPA)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than others (346g)
low resolution (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
41
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
low resolution (5 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Landscape photography with Sigma SD14
54
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
good battery (340 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
does not have Timelapse function
42
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution (5MP)
maximum ISO low (800)
lack of Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Sigma SD14 as a Vlogging camera
36
decently wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with microphone port
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
more heavy than others (346g)
9
lack of video recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD14 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sigma SD14
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSigma SD14
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sigma SD14
Class Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2012-12-18 2006-09-26
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 5 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 2640 x 1760
Highest native ISO 12800 800
Highest enhanced ISO - 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 76
Crop factor 4.8 1.7
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 150 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.6x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346g (0.76 lbs) 750g (1.65 lbs)
Dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash Type I or II
Card slots One One
Price at release $450 $198