Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD15

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sigma SD15 front
Portability
59
Imaging
44
Features
45
Overall
44

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD15 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Revealed December 2012
Sigma SD15
(Full Review)
  • 5MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Superseded the Sigma SD14
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD15 Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sigma SD15, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and SD15 (5MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and SD15 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The XZ-2 iHS was announced 2 years later than the SD15 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD15 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the SD15 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sigma SD15

 XZ-2 iHS SD15 
LaunchedDecember 2012February 2010Fresher by 35 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma SD15 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 SD15 XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sigma SD15

 XZ-2 iHS SD15 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD15 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sigma SD15 has proportions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") with a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sigma SD15 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the SD15.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD15 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and SD15 is 85 and 59 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD15 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD15 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out specs. The graphic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and SD15.

All in all, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS using its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will provide extra detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD15 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD15 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Portrait photography with Sigma SD15
46
has manual focus
provides face detect focus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
50
manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
MP count low (5MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Sigma SD15 as a Street photography camera
66
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
more heavy than average (346g)
52
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography information
Sigma SD15 Sports photography information
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
better than average battery power (340 shots)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
38
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (5MP)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Travel photography with Sigma SD15
61
better than average battery power (340 CIPA)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (346g)
megapixel count low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
42
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
MP count low (5MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD15 as a Landscape photography camera
55
has manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (340 CIPA)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
does not have Timelapse mode
51
manual focus
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
good sized screen (3")
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (5 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging features
Sigma SD15 Vlogging features
36
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has microphone port
display isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than average (346 grams)
9
can't shoot video
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma SD15 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sigma SD15
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSigma SD15
General Information
Brand Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sigma SD15
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2012-12-18 2010-02-20
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - True II
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 5 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 2640 x 1760
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Max enhanced ISO - 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Lowest enhanced ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Total lenses - 76
Crop factor 4.8 1.7
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.6x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346 grams (0.76 lb) 750 grams (1.65 lb)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $450 $1,500