Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
63 Imaging
78 Features
93 Overall
84
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
- Introduced October 2017
- Previous Model is Sony A7R II
- Later Model is Sony A7R IV
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony A7R III, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and A7R III (42MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A7R III (Full frame) posses different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 5 years before the A7R III which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A7R III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the A7R III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha A7R III. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A7R III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A7R III
XZ-2 iHS | A7R III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7R III over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A7R III | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2017 | December 2012 | Newer by 59 months | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 920k | Sharper screen (+520k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A7R III
XZ-2 iHS | A7R III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony A7R III has specifications of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") with a weight of 657 grams (1.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony A7R III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the A7R III.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and A7R III is 85 and 63 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and A7R III.
Plainly, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A7R III will offer more detail because of its extra 30 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R III Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha A7R III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha A7R III |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2017-10-25 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 32000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 657 grams (1.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | 100 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 14.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 3523 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 650 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one) |
Card slots | One | 2 |
Launch price | $450 | $2,800 |