Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R IV
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
62 Imaging
81 Features
93 Overall
85
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 61MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 665g - 129 x 96 x 78mm
- Revealed July 2019
- Replaced the Sony A7R III
- Successor is Sony A7R V
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R IV Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony A7R IV, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and A7R IV (61MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A7R IV (Full frame) provide different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 7 years earlier than the A7R IV which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A7R IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the A7R IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R IV Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Alpha A7R IV. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony A7R IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A7R IV
XZ-2 iHS | A7R IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7R IV over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A7R IV | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2019 | December 2012 | More modern by 80 months | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 920k | Clearer display (+520k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A7R IV
XZ-2 iHS | A7R IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R IV Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony A7R IV has measurements of 129mm x 96mm x 78mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.1") and a weight of 665 grams (1.47 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony A7R IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the A7R IV.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and A7R IV is 85 and 62 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R IV Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The image here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and A7R IV.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A7R IV will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 49MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7R IV Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha A7R IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha A7R IV |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2019-07-16 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 61 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 9504 x 6336 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 32000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 567 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 5,760k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 665 grams (1.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 129 x 96 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | 99 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 14.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 3344 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 670 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Dual |
Price at release | $450 | $3,498 |