Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7c
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
78 Imaging
76 Features
88 Overall
80
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 509g - 124 x 71 x 60mm
- Released September 2020
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7c Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony A7c, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and A7c (24MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A7c (Full frame) provide different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 8 years prior to the A7c which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A7c being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the A7c in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7c Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha A7c. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A7c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A7c
XZ-2 iHS | A7c |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7c over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A7c | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2020 | December 2012 | Newer by 94 months | |
Screen type | Fully articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Crisper screen (+2k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A7c
XZ-2 iHS | A7c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7c Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony A7c has sizing of 124mm x 71mm x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") along with a weight of 509 grams (1.12 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony A7c in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the A7c.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and A7c is 85 and 78 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7c Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out technical specs. The image below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and A7c.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony A7c will produce extra detail with its extra 12MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7c Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A7c Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha A7c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha A7c |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2020-09-14 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 51200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 122 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 509g (1.12 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 124 x 71 x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 740 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $450 | $1,800 |