Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is pretty similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A200 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was launched 4 years after the A200 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the A200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A200
XZ-2 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | July 2008 | Newer by 54 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A200 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200
XZ-2 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e060d/e060d018eb9cfd131b6138c402ad4cb6e0c5fed9" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and A200 is 85 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63923/639235a09989d8f64000c2fc935ba508dd451590" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The image below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and A200.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b34b5/b34b5f0fa5810dea9a1d2d685bace260816e3d8d" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef0a4/ef0a4bfe92732dcab69719586df2a985aa78d0f1" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 572 gr (1.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $450 | $100 |