Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is pretty similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A200 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 4 years after the A200 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the A200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A200
| XZ-2 iHS | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 | July 2008 | Newer by 54 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A200 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200
| XZ-2 iHS | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the A200.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and A200 is 85 and 66 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The image below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and A200.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2008-07-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 572 gr (1.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $100 |