Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is pretty similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A200 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 4 years after the A200 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the A200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A200
XZ-2 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | July 2008 | Newer by 54 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A200 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200
XZ-2 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the A200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and A200 is 85 and 66 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The image below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and A200.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 572 gr (1.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $450 | $100 |