Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
50
Features
38
Overall
45

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Announced December 2012
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Released July 2008
  • Successor is Sony A230
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Overview

The following is a complete review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is pretty similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A200 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The XZ-2 iHS was launched 4 years after the A200 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the A200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A200

 XZ-2 iHS A200 
ReleasedDecember 2012July 2008Newer by 54 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 A200 XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200

 XZ-2 iHS A200 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the A200.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and A200 is 85 and 66 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The image below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and A200.

As you can tell, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography features
Sony A200 Portrait photography features
46
you can focus manually
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
54
you can focus manually
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (10MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography advice
Sony A200 Street photography advice
66
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
heavier than competition (346 grams)
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Sports photography with Sony A200
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
good battery (340 per charge)
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
50
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography information
Sony A200 Travel photography information
61
good battery (340 shots)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (346g)
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
46
has built in flash
no Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A200 as a Landscape photography camera
55
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
good battery (340 CIPA)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
no Time Lapse recording
54
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no liveview
megapixel count low (10MP)
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Vlogging with Sony A200
36
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have mic port
doesn't have selfie friendly display
heavier than competition (346 grams)
9
can't shoot video
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A200
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2012-12-18 2008-07-17
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346 gr (0.76 pounds) 572 gr (1.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 49 63
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 11.3
DXO Low light rating 216 521
Other
Battery life 340 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $450 $100