Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A290
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A230
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A290 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A290, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A290 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A290 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 2 years after the A290 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the A290 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A290 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A290
XZ-2 iHS | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | June 2010 | More modern by 31 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A290 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A290
XZ-2 iHS | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony A290 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A290 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the A290.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and A290 is 85 and 66 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and A290.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sony A290 will produce greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A290 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-06-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 549g (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 290 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $450 | $600 |