Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Revealed December 2012
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed January 2008
  • New Model is Sony A330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A300 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The XZ-2 iHS was introduced 4 years after the A300 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the A300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A300

 XZ-2 iHS A300 
RevealedDecember 2012January 2008Newer by 60 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 A300 XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A300

 XZ-2 iHS A300 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the A300.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and A300 is 85 and 64 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and A300.

As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will resolve more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Portrait photography with Sony A300
46
you can focus manually
has face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
59
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography details
Sony A300 Street photography details
66
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
more heavy than competition in class (346g)
74
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography information
Sony A300 Sports photography information
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (340 per charge)
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
54
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports phase detect auto focus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography highlights
Sony A300 Travel photography highlights
61
better than average battery power (340 CIPA)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (346 grams)
low MP (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
45
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography features
Sony A300 Landscape photography features
55
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (340 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of Timelapse function
57
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Sony A300 as a Vlogging camera
36
rather wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external microphone port
screen is not selfie friendly
more heavy than competition in class (346g)
9
no video recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A300
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2012-12-18 2008-01-30
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346 gr (0.76 pounds) 632 gr (1.39 pounds)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 49 64
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 11.4
DXO Low light rating 216 538
Other
Battery life 340 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $450 $0