Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2008
- New Model is Sony A330
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A300 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 4 years after the A300 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the A300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A300
XZ-2 iHS | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | January 2008 | Newer by 60 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A300 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A300
XZ-2 iHS | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the A300.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and A300 is 85 and 64 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and A300.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will resolve more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2008-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 632 gr (1.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $450 | $0 |