Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A380
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
68 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A380 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A380, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A380 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A380 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 3 years after the A380 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A380 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the A380 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A380 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha DSLR-A380. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A380
XZ-2 iHS | A380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | August 2009 | More modern by 41 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A380 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A380 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A380
XZ-2 iHS | A380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A380 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony A380 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 519 grams (1.14 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A380 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the A380.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and A380 is 85 and 68 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A380 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The image here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and A380.
All in all, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony A380 will resolve more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A380 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A380 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-08-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 519g (1.14 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 614 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 500 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $450 | $899 |