Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
54
Overall
54

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Sony A390
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Introduced July 2010
  • Superseded the Sony A380
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Overview

Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A390 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 2 years after the A390 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the A390 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A390

 XZ-2 iHS A390 
IntroducedDecember 2012July 2010More modern by 30 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 A390 XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A390

 XZ-2 iHS A390 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the A390.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and A390 is 85 and 66 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and A390.

Clearly, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A390 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography advice
Sony A390 Portrait photography advice
46
has manual focus
comes with face detect focusing
supports RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
72
focusing manually
MP count good (14MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography highlights
Sony A390 Street photography highlights
66
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
heavier than competition (346 grams)
76
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
Sony A390 as a Sports photography camera
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
great battery pack (340 shots)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
60
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low battery life (230 CIPA)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Sony A390 as a Travel photography camera
61
great battery pack (340 CIPA)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (346g)
MP count low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
53
MP count good (14MP)
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
low battery life (230 per charge)
does not contain selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography advice
Sony A390 Landscape photography advice
55
has manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (340 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
missing Time Lapse recording
61
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low battery life (230 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging features
Sony A390 Vlogging features
36
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have mic port
display isn't selfie friendly
heavier than competition (346g)
9
can't record video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A390
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSony Alpha DSLR-A390
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Type Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2012-12-18 2010-07-28
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346 grams (0.76 lbs) 549 grams (1.21 lbs)
Dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 49 66
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 11.5
DXO Low light rating 216 607
Other
Battery life 340 shots 230 shots
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-90B NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $450 $500