Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Superseded the Sony A380
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A390 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 2 years after the A390 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the A390 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A390
XZ-2 iHS | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A390 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A390
XZ-2 iHS | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the A390.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and A390 is 85 and 66 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and A390.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A390 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 549 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 230 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $450 | $500 |