Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A500
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
63 Imaging
52 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 630g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Renewed by Sony A560
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A500 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A500, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A500 (12MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A500 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 3 years after the A500 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the A500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha DSLR-A500. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A500
XZ-2 iHS | A500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | August 2009 | Newer by 41 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A500 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A500 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A500
XZ-2 iHS | A500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A500 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony A500 has specifications of 137mm x 104mm x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 630 grams (1.39 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A500 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the A500.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and A500 is 85 and 63 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The image here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and A500.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS features the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF harder. The fresher XZ-2 iHS provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A500 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-08-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4272 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 630g (1.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 21.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 772 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 520 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $450 | $638 |