Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0947/b0947af385e09995bd1e56c5e9e9356bb14ab574" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front"
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A99
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony A900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and A900 (25MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A900 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was released 4 years later than the A900 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the A900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A900
XZ-2 iHS | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | ![]() | October 2008 | More recent by 51 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A900 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A900
XZ-2 iHS | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony A900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the A900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f051a/f051a6f53388d60e6d77fbc14e363b569045e2cc" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and A900 is 85 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf830/bf830877f04acf5f90479e1974dd1033d4dc2e46" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and A900.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A900 will render more detail as a result of its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9704/f970407a603a169f692f863bcadc36b6646ceced" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7100/a710051356b81128b867816ece94ff8f33deb6c9" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A900 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6048 x 4032 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 895 gr (1.97 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 880 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | 1 | 2 |
Launch price | $450 | $2,736 |