Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-C3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was released 17 months later than the NEX-C3 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the NEX-C3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony NEX-C3
XZ-2 iHS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 17 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
NEX-C3 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-C3
XZ-2 iHS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony NEX-C3 has measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-C3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91a7b/91a7b0c6cc87e47c3c7fea83872d7912d56005df" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and NEX-C3 is 85 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8e39/c8e3943305223d971a54914d943aef16686b59f7" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and NEX-C3.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Sony NEX-C3 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7123d/7123d1490e4fa08ca8d95c7980be6c527e36e403" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9908b/9908bd16bd78db454d903d0ba299b9c40ac21d53" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 400 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $450 | $343 |