Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6300
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Announced February 2016
- Superseded the Sony A6000
- Renewed by Sony A6500
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6300 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A6300 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 4 years earlier than the A6300 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the A6300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha a6300. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A6300
XZ-2 iHS | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A6300 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | December 2012 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A6300
XZ-2 iHS | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the A6300.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and A6300 is 85 and 83 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The visual here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and A6300.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony A6300 will give you more detail because of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2016-02-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 404 grams (0.89 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 400 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $450 | $889 |