Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6500
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
81 Imaging
67 Features
85 Overall
74
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 453g - 120 x 67 x 53mm
- Released October 2016
- Older Model is Sony A6300
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6500 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony A6500, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and A6500 (24MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A6500 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 4 years before the A6500 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A6500 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the A6500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha a6500. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A6500
XZ-2 iHS | A6500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6500 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A6500 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2016 | December 2012 | Fresher by 46 months | |
Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A6500
XZ-2 iHS | A6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6500 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony A6500 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 53mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony A6500 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the A6500.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and A6500 is 85 and 81 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and A6500.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A6500 will provide more detail using its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A6500 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha a6500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha a6500 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2016-10-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction (On/Off selectable), Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 453 grams (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 120 x 67 x 53mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 24.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 1405 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $450 | $1,298 |