Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ff55/6ff550c477638a6fe812d244fc23c627cd51c28f" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front"
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Launched January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and H200 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and H200 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was released very close to the H200 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the H200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony H200
XZ-2 iHS | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
H200 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H200
XZ-2 iHS | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2013 | Similar generation |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the H200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55c16/55c16d1bcaa651b6bfc6a4f1ed6cd00164153365" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and H200 is 85 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/197e4/197e4943f4c369f21ff0d14fc42fda31056655c5" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and H200.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Sony H200 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c333882b5fb3661a5b72b195a6ac24da110d9c7f" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ddce/1ddcefcce6fd1ab5aa9af985d41fb983f4beb5aa" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H200 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 2920 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 20cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 530g (1.17 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 240 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | Li-90B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $450 | $250 |