Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8d31/e8d315a1c42fc97ab7f34fb3dfd3dd8ecf9d8ac5" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front"
69 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-465mm (F2.7-4.5) lens
- 547g - 116 x 81 x 86mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony H50, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and H50 (9MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and H50 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was released 3 years later than the H50 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the H50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony H50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony H50
XZ-2 iHS | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H50 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
H50 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H50
XZ-2 iHS | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony H50 has proportions of 116mm x 81mm x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") and a weight of 547 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony H50 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the H50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aef72/aef7202f1aef2319b9e1055c6569a02ad884957d" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and H50 is 85 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdbc5/bdbc575b6f5887add6d2ee1143698bbea22bd6e3" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The visual here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and H50.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0009f/0009f9736c36730576a418dd4043c2fda80d6ad2" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbcb7/cbcb7ed9d0851ed954b5a10d7af4db2f56f896d2" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H50 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 31-465mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.7-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 9.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480, 30 fps, 320 x 240, 8 fps |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 547g (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 116 x 81 x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $450 | $80 |