Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H55
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
92 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H55 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony H55, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the H55 (14MP) is fairly similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and H55 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 2 years after the H55 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the H55 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H55 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony H55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony H55
XZ-2 iHS | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | June 2010 | More modern by 31 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
H55 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H55
XZ-2 iHS | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony H55 has dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony H55 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the H55.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and H55 is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and H55.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony H55 will offer greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H55 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 200 gr (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $450 | $235 |