Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H70
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
93 Imaging
38 Features
31 Overall
35
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H70 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H70, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and H70 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and H70 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 24 months later than the H70 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the H70 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H70 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H70. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony H70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony H70
| XZ-2 iHS | H70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H70 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| H70 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H70
| XZ-2 iHS | H70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H70 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony H70 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H70 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the H70.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and H70 is 85 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H70 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at technical specs. The visual below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and H70.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Sony H70 will resolve more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H70 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $450 | $199 |