Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H90
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 222g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Revealed February 2012
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H90 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H90, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and H90 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and H90 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 10 months after the H90 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the H90 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H90 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony H90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony H90
XZ-2 iHS | H90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | February 2012 | Newer by 10 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H90 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
H90 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H90
XZ-2 iHS | H90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H90 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony H90 has proportions of 105mm x 60mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H90 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the H90.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and H90 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H90 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and H90.
As you can tell, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony H90 will offer you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H90 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 222g (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 290 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $450 | $230 |