Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX7V
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX7V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 208g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX7V Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX7V, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and HX7V (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HX7V (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was released 18 months later than the HX7V making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the HX7V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX7V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7V. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony HX7V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony HX7V
XZ-2 iHS | HX7V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | July 2011 | More recent by 18 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX7V over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
HX7V | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX7V
XZ-2 iHS | HX7V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX7V Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony HX7V has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX7V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the HX7V.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and HX7V is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX7V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The photograph here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and HX7V.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Sony HX7V will provide more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX7V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX7V Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7V |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $450 | $499 |