Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX90V
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
91 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX90V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 245g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced April 2015
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX90V Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX90V, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and HX90V (18MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HX90V (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 3 years before the HX90V and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the HX90V for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX90V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony HX90V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony HX90V
XZ-2 iHS | HX90V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX90V over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
HX90V | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | December 2012 | Fresher by 28 months | |
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX90V
XZ-2 iHS | HX90V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX90V Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony HX90V has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX90V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the HX90V.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and HX90V is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX90V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through technical specs. The visual below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and HX90V.
As you have seen, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Sony HX90V will give extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX90V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX90V Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2015-04-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 360 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $450 | $440 |