Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched September 2017
- Superseded the Sony RX10 III
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony RX10 IV, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and RX10 IV (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and RX10 IV (1") posses totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was released 5 years earlier than the RX10 IV and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the RX10 IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony RX10 IV
XZ-2 iHS | RX10 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
RX10 IV | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2017 | December 2012 | More recent by 57 months | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 920k | Sharper screen (+520k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony RX10 IV
XZ-2 iHS | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 IV has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony RX10 IV in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the RX10 IV.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and RX10 IV is 85 and 52 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The visual below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and RX10 IV.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX10 IV will give you more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2017-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 1095g (2.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 400 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $450 | $1,698 |