Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 IV
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
89 Imaging
52 Features
79 Overall
62
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 298g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Launched June 2015
- Old Model is Sony RX100 III
- Refreshed by Sony RX100 V
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 IV Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 IV, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and RX100 IV (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and RX100 IV (1") offer different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was released 3 years earlier than the RX100 IV which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 IV being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the RX100 IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 IV Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony RX100 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony RX100 IV
XZ-2 iHS | RX100 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 IV over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
RX100 IV | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2015 | December 2012 | More modern by 30 months | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 920k | Crisper screen (+309k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony RX100 IV
XZ-2 iHS | RX100 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 IV Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 IV has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") having a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 IV in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the RX100 IV.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and RX100 IV is 85 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 IV Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The pic underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and RX100 IV.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sony RX100 IV will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 IV Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2015-06-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 16.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 298 gr (0.66 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 562 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 280 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $450 | $898 |