Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
89 Imaging
53 Features
80 Overall
63
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Introduced October 2016
- Replaced the Sony RX100 IV
- Later Model is Sony RX100 VI
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony RX100 V, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and RX100 V (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and RX100 V (1") boast different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was released 4 years earlier than the RX100 V and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the RX100 V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony RX100 V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony RX100 V
XZ-2 iHS | RX100 V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
RX100 V | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2016 | December 2012 | Fresher by 46 months | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 920k | Clearer screen (+309k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony RX100 V
XZ-2 iHS | RX100 V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 V has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony RX100 V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the RX100 V.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and RX100 V is 85 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and RX100 V.
Clearly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX100 V will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2016-10-06 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 24.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 299 grams (0.66 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 586 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 220 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $450 | $998 |