Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX1R
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released June 2013
- Replacement is Sony RX1R II
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX1R Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony RX1R, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and RX1R (Full frame) come with totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 6 months before the RX1R so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the RX1R with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX1R Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony RX1R
XZ-2 iHS | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
RX1R | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1229k | 920k | Sharper screen (+309k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony RX1R
XZ-2 iHS | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | June 2013 | Similar age | |
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony RX1R in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the RX1R.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and RX1R is 85 and 79 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The pic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and RX1R.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony RX1R will give more detail because of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a little more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2013-06-26 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 482g (1.06 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | 91 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 270 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $450 | $2,798 |