Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/777f4/777f4738a75e07be4efdf04b6a8248a582ca2b95" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front"
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony S2000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and S2000 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was announced 2 years later than the S2000 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the S2000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony S2000
XZ-2 iHS | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 36 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S2000 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony S2000
XZ-2 iHS | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony S2000 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony S2000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the S2000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d589/9d589af91fa28950694f694f53033b2e30b8ef0c" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and S2000 is 85 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90a1c/90a1c272599f239b5c23f1912addffa9206a8917" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and S2000.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will show more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/204e3/204e3ca39c86021c27c7e23de3d2deafac70533d" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bdfd/1bdfd4cc1c3559589e545fc16bd843ffd23ae3c6" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $450 | $225 |