Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2100
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
93 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2100 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2100, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S2100 (12MP) is very close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and S2100 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was released 2 years later than the S2100 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the S2100 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony S2100
| XZ-2 iHS | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 36 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S2100 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony S2100
| XZ-2 iHS | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony S2100 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2100 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the S2100.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and S2100 is 85 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and S2100.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses the exact same megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS uses the larger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh easier. The younger XZ-2 iHS provides an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S2100 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $450 | $0 |
