Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 320 x 240 video
- 38-108mm (F2.9-5.4) lens
- 167g - 90 x 61 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony S930, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S930 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and S930 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 4 years after the S930 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the S930 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony S930 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony S930
| XZ-2 iHS | S930 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 112k | Crisper screen (+808k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S930 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S930 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony S930
| XZ-2 iHS | S930 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony S930 has proportions of 90mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony S930 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the S930.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and S930 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specs. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and S930.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will resolve more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 38-108mm (2.8x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.9-5.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 112k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Syncro, No Flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 90 x 61 x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / PRo-HG Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $450 | $219 |