Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 320 x 240 video
- 38-108mm (F2.9-5.4) lens
- 167g - 90 x 61 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2009
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony S930, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S930 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and S930 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 4 years after the S930 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the S930 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony S930 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony S930
| XZ-2 iHS | S930 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 112k | Crisper screen (+808k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S930 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S930 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony S930
| XZ-2 iHS | S930 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony S930 has proportions of 90mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony S930 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the S930.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and S930 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specs. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and S930.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will resolve more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S930 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 38-108mm (2.8x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.9-5.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 112k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Syncro, No Flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 90 x 61 x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / PRo-HG Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $450 | $219 |