Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S980
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
94 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Launched February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S980 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S980, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S980 (12MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and S980 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was released 3 years after the S980 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the S980 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S980 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony S980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony S980
| XZ-2 iHS | S980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 | February 2009 | More modern by 47 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S980 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S980 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony S980
| XZ-2 iHS | S980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S980 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony S980 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S980 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the S980.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and S980 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S980 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The picture here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and S980.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact MP but different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS includes the larger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF simpler. The younger XZ-2 iHS should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S980 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony S980 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $450 | $300 |