Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T110
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
96 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-108mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T110 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T110, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and T110 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and T110 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 24 months after the T110 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony T110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the T110 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T110 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony T110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony T110
| XZ-2 iHS | T110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 | January 2011 | More modern by 24 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T110 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| T110 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony T110
| XZ-2 iHS | T110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T110 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony T110 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T110 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the T110.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and T110 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T110 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing specifications. The picture here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and T110.
To sum up, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Sony T110 will provide greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T110 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T110 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | Clear Photo LCD Plus with touchscreen interface |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 2.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $450 | $199 |