Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T900
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T900, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and T900 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 3 years later than the T900 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the T900 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony T900
| XZ-2 iHS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 47 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| T900 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony T900
| XZ-2 iHS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the T900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and T900 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The photograph below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and T900.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer the same exact MP but different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS features the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The more recent XZ-2 iHS provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 143 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $300 |
