Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TF1
Portability
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Portability
94 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
94 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TF1 Key Specs
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Sony TF1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.6-4.7) lens
- 152g - 102 x 62 x 23mm
- Launched June 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TF1 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TF1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and TF1 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TF1 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 6 months before the TF1 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the TF1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TF1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony TF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony TF1
| XZ-2 iHS | TF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TF1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TF1 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony TF1
| XZ-2 iHS | TF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 |  | June 2013 | Same age |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TF1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony TF1 has proportions of 102mm x 62mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TF1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the TF1.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and TF1 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TF1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The image below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and TF1.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Sony TF1 will render extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TF1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography details
Sony TF1 Portrait photography details
focusing manually
supports face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography highlights
Sony TF1 Street photography highlights
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
heavier than competition in class (346g)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes touch to focus
environment proof
lighter than competitors (152 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography information
Sony TF1 Sports photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
great battery life (340 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proof
slow fps (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (240 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Travel photography with Sony TF1
great battery life (340 CIPA)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (346g)
MP count low (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lighter than competitors (152 grams)
environment proof
includes touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
no Timelapse function
not so great battery life (240 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography information
Sony TF1 Landscape photography information
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
great battery life (340 CIPA)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
no Time Lapse recording
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
environment proof
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
not so great battery life (240 per charge)
no Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging details
Sony TF1 Vlogging details
relatively wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with mic jack
does not contain selfie friendly display
heavier than competition in class (346 grams)
rather wide (25mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
lighter than competitors (152g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone port
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TF1 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2013-06-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.6-4.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 152g (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 62 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | 240 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $450 | $266 |