Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony TX200V, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TX200V (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 11 months after the TX200V which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the TX200V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony TX200V
XZ-2 iHS | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | January 2012 | More modern by 11 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TX200V | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 920k | Crisper display (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony TX200V
XZ-2 iHS | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the TX200V.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and TX200V is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and TX200V.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Sony TX200V will produce more detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 129 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 220 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $450 | $500 |