Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX9
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Launched July 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX9 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony TX9, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TX9 (12MP) is relatively similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TX9 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 2 years after the TX9 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the TX9 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX9 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony TX9
| XZ-2 iHS | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TX9 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony TX9
| XZ-2 iHS | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony TX9 has sizing of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony TX9 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the TX9.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and TX9 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over specs. The image below should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and TX9.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS features the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler. The newer XZ-2 iHS will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX9 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2010-07-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $450 | $799 |